The complex expertise and launch infrastructure to fly all of it wouldn’t be included. Competitors or new commercial launchers won’t bother to buy out the SpaceX technology. cost of 2nd stage = 1 * cost of merlin + ( cost of stage 1 fuselage / 2 ) Cost of each Merlin engine is ~$1.5M. Under methodology #1, the cost model predicted that the Falcon 9 would cost \$4 billion based on a traditional approach. The mission will mark the debut of the Block 5 version of the company’s Falcon 9, the most advanced upgrade of the rocket to date and the last major version of … Russia quietly shelves development of sole SpaceX Falcon 9 ... the vehicle was estimated by Russia itself to cost ... was being designed as a purely commercial competitor to SpaceX’s Falcon 9. 1) Cost to develop Falcon 9 using traditional NASA approach, and 2) Cost using a more commercial development approach. Russia quietly shelves development of sole SpaceX Falcon 9 ... the vehicle was estimated by Russia itself to cost ... was being designed as a purely commercial competitor to SpaceX’s Falcon 9. Also, of note is how the Falcon Heavy cost SpaceX about a roughly $500 million to develop (on top of Falcon 9 development costs) and about $90 million per launch. Cost of first stage is speculated earlier to be between $30M to $35M; but assuming here as $29M. Also, of note is how the Falcon Heavy cost SpaceX about a roughly $500 million to develop (on top of Falcon 9 development costs) and about $90 million per launch. SpaceX CEO Elon Musk reveals a new detail about the company's new Falcon Heavy rocket. Under methodology #1, the cost model predicted that the Falcon 9 would cost $4.0 billion based on a traditional approach. Falcon 9 Launch Vehicle NAFCOM Cost Estimate • The objective of the analysis was to estimate the cost to develop the Falcon 9 launch vehicle using two different approaches: 1) traditional NASA envi/lironment/culture, and 2) a more commercilial dldevelopment culture approach. In 2011, SpaceX estimated that Falcon 9 v1.0 development costs were on the order of $300 million. All that for a rocket which has the payload throw mass (aka how much the rocket can put into space) of about 2/3rds of what SLS Block I claims to be able to launch. Under methodology #2, NAFCOM predicted \$1.7 billion when the inputs were adjusted to a more commercial development … Cost of second stage fuselage is roughly half of first stage. That’s bothersome because you’d just be buying the hardware. That means Falcon Heavy has enough contracts to cover the cost of its development, which was more than $500 million, Musk noted last year, with the all funding coming from inside SpaceX. 2) Cost using a more commercial development approach. SpaceX is not a publicly traded company so they don’t have to publish their financial data. In 2014, SpaceX released total combined development costs for both the Falcon 9 and the Dragon capsule. All that for a rocket which has the payload throw mass (aka how much the rocket can put into space) of about 2/3rds of what SLS Block I claims to be able to launch. NASA evaluated that development costs would have been $3.6 billion if a traditional cost-plus contract approach had been used.

So: cost of first stage = 9 * cost of merlin + cost of fuselage. A maxed-out version of the rocket would cost $150 million per launch, Musk says in a tweet. No one in the general public can know for sure.